Disrupting Retail Banking - The Era of Big Tech
DESCRIPTION
TABLE OF CONTENTS
RELATED REPORTS
SAMPLE REQUEST
REVIEWS
DESCRIPTION
Disrupting Retail Banking - The Era of Big Tech
Summary
This report provides in-depth analysis into the financial services strategies of technology companies. We look at their paths up until now, the products and services they have developed, their likely next moves, and how effective they will be at displacing the primary account relationship incumbent banks currently hold.
The increasing role technology plays in 21st century life has led to the banking sector being the latest industry to be disrupted. This has led traditional incumbent banks to make technology a key part of their strategic goals, including dedicated technology departments and chief technology officers as well as partnerships with technology giants. As technology and particularly data play an even greater role in financial services, it has become apparent that very little stands in the way of technology giants offering financial services themselves. They have the reach, resources, and brand to entice customers, who are more willing than ever to try new offerings due to the stagnant levels of service they have received over the last two decades.
Scope
- Tech companies are developing ecosystems on their platforms through which they hope to extract as much value from customers as possible. Previously tech companies only sought to collect user data, which they often sold on to third parties. Now data is increasingly being used internally to understand how to influence customer decision-making - particularly as it relates to the integrated marketplaces on their platforms.
- The approach to revenue generation by big tech companies has been monolithic. All companies have effectively prioritized growth at the expense of revenue, and have not monetized the vast majority of financial services products they have launched.
- While the likes of Facebook, Amazon, and Google are all entering financial services, they have each done so from different angles. This suggests there is no one way for such companies to enter the industry, meaning the threat to incumbents is larger than anticipated and cannot be precisely mapped.
Reasons to Buy
- Gain an understanding of the technology companies entering financial services, as well as the approaches and products they have used to gain a foothold.
- Realize which tech companies are the biggest threats to incumbent banks and the timeline of how these threats are emerging.
- Understand the potential embedded finance has for technology companies, and the ease with which such companies can move into financial services.
Summary
This report provides in-depth analysis into the financial services strategies of technology companies. We look at their paths up until now, the products and services they have developed, their likely next moves, and how effective they will be at displacing the primary account relationship incumbent banks currently hold.
The increasing role technology plays in 21st century life has led to the banking sector being the latest industry to be disrupted. This has led traditional incumbent banks to make technology a key part of their strategic goals, including dedicated technology departments and chief technology officers as well as partnerships with technology giants. As technology and particularly data play an even greater role in financial services, it has become apparent that very little stands in the way of technology giants offering financial services themselves. They have the reach, resources, and brand to entice customers, who are more willing than ever to try new offerings due to the stagnant levels of service they have received over the last two decades.
Scope
- Tech companies are developing ecosystems on their platforms through which they hope to extract as much value from customers as possible. Previously tech companies only sought to collect user data, which they often sold on to third parties. Now data is increasingly being used internally to understand how to influence customer decision-making - particularly as it relates to the integrated marketplaces on their platforms.
- The approach to revenue generation by big tech companies has been monolithic. All companies have effectively prioritized growth at the expense of revenue, and have not monetized the vast majority of financial services products they have launched.
- While the likes of Facebook, Amazon, and Google are all entering financial services, they have each done so from different angles. This suggests there is no one way for such companies to enter the industry, meaning the threat to incumbents is larger than anticipated and cannot be precisely mapped.
Reasons to Buy
- Gain an understanding of the technology companies entering financial services, as well as the approaches and products they have used to gain a foothold.
- Realize which tech companies are the biggest threats to incumbent banks and the timeline of how these threats are emerging.
- Understand the potential embedded finance has for technology companies, and the ease with which such companies can move into financial services.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
1. Executive Summary
1.1 Market overview
1.2 Key findings
1.3 Critical success factors
1.4 Competitor update
2. Survey Data
3. Google
3.1 Googles most significant movement into financial services has been via partnerships with incumbent banks
3.2 Due to Googles size, brand, and history it is targeting the entire market, not a specific demographic
3.3 Google offers complementary products and a strong user experience/interface
3.4 Googles marketing efforts have targeted existing customers as opposed to acquiring new ones
3.5 Google has multiple revenue streams, with the potential to monetize Google Pay
3.6 Google is best placed to disrupt financial services, but must be wary of anti-trust regulation
4. Amazon
4.1 Amazon has developed payment and lending infrastructure and is set to launch BNPL and banking services
4.2 Amazon is prioritizing existing customer and merchant relationships to increase ecosystem activity
4.3 Amazons financial services are differentiated by the complementary use of them in the Amazon ecosystem
4.4 Amazons marketing strategy has involved developing deeper relations with existing customers and merchants
4.5 Amazons revenue from financial services is small but has potential to be significant if further monetized
4.6 Amazon faces regulators seeking to level the playing field between ecommerce and physical stores
5. Facebook
5.1 Facebook entered financial services with payments infrastructure
5.2 Facebook users are incredibly diverse in terms of age and geography
5.3 Facebooks services are differentiated by their links to WhatsApp and Instagram, as well as design superiority
5.4 Facebook is marketing new services to existing users, particularly in developing markets
5.5 Facebooks scope to monetize financial services is significant but could slow growth
5.6 Facebooks impact on democracy has regulators around the world bearing down on the company
6. Uber
6.1 Uber has entered financial services as a platform for its 3.9 million drivers worldwide
6.2 Ubers main demographic is its drivers, particularly in developing markets
6.3 Uber is differentiated via its relationship with its drivers and its superior user experience
6.4 Ubers marketing strategy for financial services has focused on its drivers
6.5 Ubers financial services would likely not be monetized so as to boost growth
6.6 Uber expects to reach profitability at the end of 2021, after which financial services projects may be resumed
7. PayPal
7.1 PayPal is evolving from payment processor to super app as it launches new products and makes significant acquisitions
7.2 PayPal initially targeted online shoppers but is now following a more blanket customer acquisition strategy
7.3 PayPals services are differentiated by their simplicity and security
7.4 PayPals marketing strategy has involved referral bonuses, but now focuses on existing customers
7.5 PayPal generates revenue from the various services it offers, which often include a fee or interest rate
7.6 PayPal aims to become a super app, and the acquisition of Honey points to an embedded ecommerce approach
8. Klarna
8.1 Klarna has gone from escrow service to bank, and could become a super app with an ecommerce platform
8.2 Klarnas main demographic is young people who shop online and need flexible finance options
8.3 While BNPL is being widely adopted, Klarna is unique in that it offers an ecommerce app
8.4 Klarnas marketing strategy involves mutually beneficial partnerships with retailers
8.5 Klarna generates revenue from merchants and consumers
8.6 Klarna is expected to roll out banking services across Europe and launch complementary products such as PFM tools
9. Yolt
9.1 Yolt entered financial services as an AISP but is becoming more action-oriented
9.2 Yolts target demographic is younger customers who need to be able to plan their finances in detail
9.3 Yolt combines data from multiple accounts and allows customers to take action via its platform
9.4 Yolt has outsourced its marketing activities and is targeting younger, tech-savvy customers
9.5 Yolts app is free but it has launched a number of services that have charges built in
9.6 With the backing of ING, Yolt could launch full retail banking services and incorporate them with the DealWise platform
10. Robinhood
10.1 Robinhood entered the market as a brokerage platform but has potential to bring banking services under its umbrella
10.2 Robinhoods target demographic is young customers who have previously been excluded from financial services
10.3 Robinhood once differentiated via its free business model, but now relies on user experience and premium features
10.4 Robinhood has spent significant sums on advertising, as well as using referral bonuses and gamified waiting lists
10.5 Robinhood earns revenue from order flow generation and premium services
10.6 Robinhood is expected to launch an IPO this year and expand to Europe, having cancelled plans in 2020
11. Appendix
11.1 Abbreviations and acronyms
11.2 Secondary sources
11.3 Further reading
About GlobalData
Contact Us
List Of Figures
Figure 1: Preference for transaction/savings accounts from big tech providers
Figure 2: Preference for budgeting tools from big tech providers
Figure 3: If you were to open any of the following financial products and services, which type of provider would you prefer to use?
Figure 4: Google timeline
Figure 5: Amazon timeline
Figure 6: Facebook timeline
Figure 7: Uber timeline
Figure 8: PayPal timeline
Figure 9: Klarna timeline
Figure 10: Yolt timeline
Figure 11: Robinhood timeline
RELATED REPORTS
United Kingdom (UK) Retail Banking - Competitor Benchmarking 2021
United Kingdom (UK) Retail Banking - Competitor Benchmarking 2021This report, which is part of a series of UK content including market analysis and consumer profiles, looks at market performance, retention
View ReportHong Kong Retail Banking - Competitor Benchmarking 2021
Hong Kong Retail Banking - Competitor Benchmarking 2021Despite the impact of COVID-19, banks in Hong Kong remain well capitalized and ready to support recovery going forward. All incumbents increased their
View ReportSAMPLE REQUEST
Fill The Form For Sample Request
REVIEWS
