Marcellus and Utica Shales in the United States of America (USA) - Gas Shale Market Analysis and Outlook to 2021

Marcellus and Utica Shales in the United States of America (USA) - Gas Shale Market Analysis and Outlook to 2021



The Appalachia Basin which is made up of the Marcellus formations and the Utica Shale, accounted for more than 40% of the natural gas produced in the United States in 2020. Most of the production comes from the state of Pennsylvania and Ohio and partially from West Virginia. Unlike many of the oil plays in the US Lower 48, the natural gas plays including the Appalachia Basin saw a less drastic change in production and drilling activity during the economic contraction caused by the Covid-19 pandemic.

While major oil-producing operators slashed their 2020 capital expenditure up to 50% - 60%, the top three producers in the Appalachia Basin EQT Corporation, Antero Resources, and Southwestern Energy have only cut their capital by 20%, 35% and 40%, respectively. This region averaged 32.19 billion cubic feet of natural gas per day (bcfd) and 33.44 bcfd in 2019 and 2020, respectively.

Scope

The report analyzes the crude oil and natural gas appraisal and production activities in Marcellus and Utica Shales play in the US. The scope of the report includes -
- Comprehensive analysis of natural gas and crude oil historical production and short term outlook of Marcellus and Utica shale plays during 2019-2021
- Detailed information of impact on well development, permits and deals due to COVID-19 pandemic
- In-depth information on net acreage, operational performance and financial standings of major operators in Marcellus and Utica shale plays
- Analysis of top companies’ future plans and cost trends in 2020
- Up-to-date information on associated infrastructure and major mergers and acquisitions in Marcellus and Utica shale plays between 2018 and 2020

Reasons to Buy

- Develop business strategies with the help of specific insights into Marcellus and Utica shale plays in the US
- Plan your strategies based on economic viability and expected developments in Marcellus and Utica shale plays
- Keep yourself informed with the latest M&A activity in these shale plays
- Identify opportunities and challenges in Marcellus and Utica shale plays


1. Overview
1.1 Marcellus and Utica Shale Plays, Recent Developments and Trends
2. Marcellus and Utica Shale Plays, Introduction
2.1 Marcellus and Utica Shale Plays, Formation Overview
3. Marcellus and Utica Shale Plays, Production and Activity Overview
3.1 Marcellus and Utica Shale Plays, Production Analysis, 2017-2019
3.2 Marcellus and Utica Shale Plays, COVID-19 Impact on Production
3.3 Marcellus and Utica Shale Plays, Production Outlook, 2020-2021
3.4 Marcellus and Utica Shale Plays, Drilling Activity
3.5 Well profile
4. Marcellus and Utica Shale Plays, Competitive Benchmarking
4.1 Marcellus and Utica Shale Plays, Major Companies with Prominent Presence, 2020
4.2 Marcellus and Utica Shale Plays, Major Companies’ Financial Standings
4.3 Marcellus and Utica Shale Plays, Operational Performance of Leading Operators
4.4 Marcellus and Utica Shale Plays, Completion Parameters, 2020
4.5 Marcellus and Utica Shale Plays, Future Plans of Major Companies
4.6 Marcellus and Utica Shale Plays, Cost Trends, 2020
5. Marcellus and Utica Shale Plays, Analysis of Bankrupt Companies
5.1 Gulfport Energy Corp
5.2 Chesapeake Energy Corp
6. Marcellus and Utica Shale Plays, Associated Infrastructure
6.1 Pipelines
7. Mergers and Acquisition Activity in the Marcellus and Utica Shale Plays, 2018-2020
7.1 Overview of M&A Activity
7.2 Major Acquisitions
8. Marcellus and Utica Shale Plays, Analysis of Major Companies
8.1 Antero Resources Corporation
8.2 Cabot Oil & Gas Corporation
8.3 Chesapeake Energy
8.4 CNX Resources Corporation
8.5 EQT Corporation
8.6 ExxonMobil Corporation
8.7 Range Resources Corporation
8.8 Southwestern Energy Company
8.9 Gulfport Energy Corporation
8.10 National Fuel Gas Company
8.11 Equinor ASA
8.12 Ascent Resources Utica, LLC
8.13 Chief Oil & Gas LLC
9. Appendix
9.1 Abbreviations
9.2 Methodology


List Of Tables


Table 1: Marcellus and Utica Shale Plays, Crude oil and natural gas production, 2017-2019
Table 2: Marcellus and Utica Shale Plays, Net Acreage by Company, 2020
Table 3: Marcellus and Utica Shale Plays, Reserves and Production by Major Companies, November 2020
Table 4: Marcellus and Utica Shale Plays, Financial Standings of Major Companies, Q3 2020
Table 5: Marcellus and Utica Shale Plays, Operational Performance of Leading Operators, 2020
Table 6: Marcellus and Utica Shale Plays, Planned Capital Expenditure by Major Companies, 2020 (US$ million)
Table 7: Gulfport Energy, Marcellus and Utica Shale Plays, Key Financial Parameters, 2020
Table 8: Gulfport Energy, Marcellus and Utica Shale Plays, Key Operational Parameters, 2020
Table 9: Gulfport Energy, Marcellus and Utica Shale Plays, Key Economics, 2020
Table 10: Chesapeake Energy, Mercellus and Utica Shale Plays, Key Financial Parameters, 2020
Table 11: Chesapeake Energy, Marcellus and Utica Shale Plays, Key Operational Parameters, 2020
Table 12: Chesapeake Energy, Marcellus and Utica Shale Plays, Key Economics, 2020
Table 13: Marcellus and Utica Shale Plays, Major Active Pipelines, 2020
Table 14: Marcellus & Utica Shales, Major Deals by Oil and Gas Companies, 2018-2020


List Of Figures


Figure 1: Appalachia Basin Oil and Natural Gas Production
Figure 2: Henry Hub vs International Natural Gas Prices (US$/mcf)
Figure 3: Marcellus Shale, Crude Oil and Condensate Production by County (mbd), 2017-2019
Figure 4: Marcellus Shale, Natural Gas Production by County, mmcfd, 2017-2019
Figure 5: Utica Shale, Crude Oil and Condensate Production by County (mbd), 2017-2019
Figure 6: Utica Shale, Natural Gas Production by County, mmcfd, 2017-2019
Figure 7: Marcellus and Utica Shale Plays, COVID-19 Impact on Production, 2020
Figure 8: Marcellus and Utica Shale Plays, Production Outlook, 2020-2021
Figure 9: Marcellus Shale, Number of Well Permits by County, January 2019 to November 2020
Figure 10: Utica Shale, Number of Well Permits by County, January 2019 to November 2020
Figure 11: Marcellus Shale, Number of Well Permits by Key Operators, January 2019 to November 2020
Figure 12: Utica Shale, Number of Well Permits by Key Operators, January 2019 to November 2020
Figure 13: Marcellus and Utica Shale Plays, Well Profile for Natural Gas Equivalent Production
Figure 14: Marcellus and Utica Shale Plays, Quartile Distribution of EUR (mmboe)
Figure 15: Marcellus and Utica Shale Plays, Proppant Mass (million lbs) vs Lateral Length (ft)
Figure 16: Marcellus and Utica Shale Plays, Average Peak Crude Production vs Lateral Length (ft) Quartile
Figure 17: Marcellus and Utica Shale Plays, Peak Natural Gas Production vs Lateral Length, 2020
Figure 18: Marcellus and Utica Shale Plays, Natural Gas EUR vs Lateral Length, 2020
Figure 19: Marcellus and Utica Shale Plays, Major Companies by Well Costs (US$ mil), 2020
Figure 20: Marcellus and Utica Shale Plays, Active NGL and Natural Gas Pipelines by Capacity, 2020


Marcellus and Utica Shales in the US, 2019 - Gas Shales Market Analysis and Outlook to 2023

Marcellus and Utica Shales in the US, 2019 - Gas Shales Market Analysis and Outlook to 2023 market research report available in single user pdf license with Aarkstore Enterprise at USD 3999

USD 3999 View Report

Marcellus and Utica Shales in the US, 2019 - Gas Shales Market Analysis and Outlook to 2023

Marcellus and Utica Shales in the US, 2019 - Gas Shales Market Analysis and Outlook to 2023 market research report available in single user pdf license with Aarkstore Enterprise at USD 3999

USD 3999 View Report

Fill The Form For Sample Request

Note : * Kindly provide us with your company id and get the sample reports at the earliest.

There is no Reviews available